International organizations as mediators in the interaction between states and civil society during wartime crises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17489946Keywords:
international mediation, humanitarian assistance, public administration, civil society, armed conflicts, political stability.Abstract
The purpose of the study is to comprehensively determine the role of international organizations as mediators in the interaction between the state and civil society during wartime crises, and to assess their impact on the stabilization of domestic policy, the provision of humanitarian assistance, and the promotion of reforms across various spheres. The research employs a systemic approach was applied to analyze the role of international organizations in the interaction between the state and civil society; a structural-functional method – to identify the main areas of activity of international institutions during wartime crises; a comparative legal method – to compare the mediation mechanisms of different organizations in international practice; and a case study method – to analyze specific examples, particularly the experience of Ukraine. The research results indicate the key role of international organizations in ensuring the stability and development of state institutions during wartime crises, coordinating the activities of state and non-state actors, facilitating access to financial, technical, and humanitarian support, and monitoring compliance with international norms in the fields of human rights, security, and the economy. The analysis of specific cases, including the war in Ukraine, confirms the high efficiency of such organizations in creating conditions for dialogue between the state and civil society, preventing conflict escalation, increasing transparency in governance, and building trust in national and international institutions. The conclusions demonstrate that the role of international organizations as mediators is multifaceted and complex, encompassing legal, security, humanitarian, socio-economic, and political dimensions. At the same time, the effectiveness of their activities is limited by the political interests of member states, bureaucratic procedures, unequal resource distribution among conflict parties, and a lack of effective coordination mechanisms. The findings suggest strengthening cooperation and coordination between international structures and national authorities, improving mechanisms for civil society participation in decision-making processes, developing methodologies to assess mediation effectiveness in crises, and integrating practical recommendations into national strategies for responding to wartime crises and overcoming their consequences.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Максим Валерійович Демідов

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.