Reintegration of De-occupied Territories: Potential Challenges

Authors

  • Nataliia Khoma ScD in Political Science, professor at the Department of Political Science and International Relations, Lviv Polytechnic National University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2507-5741

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20441611

Keywords:

de-occupation, reintegration, temporarily occupied territories, state reintegration strategy, post-war reconstruction, post-conflict society, state institutional capacity, national consolidation.

Abstract

The aim of this article is to systematise and provide an analytical generalisation of the main challenges that may arise in the process of reintegrating Ukraine’s de-occupied territories during the post-war reconstruction phase.

The research is based on systemic and interdisciplinary approaches, as well as methods of conceptual analysis and typologisation. Logical-analytical structuring is applied to the prospective reintegration of de-occupied territories as an integral component of Ukraine’s post-war reconstruction.

The article identifies ten groups of potential challenges associated with the reintegration of Ukraine’s de-occupied territories: political and institutional, security-related, social, humanitarian and psychological, informational and identity-related, economic, legal, infrastructural and environmental, geopolitical and international, as well as value-normative challenges. It is demonstrated that these groups are analytically distinct, yet empirically interrelated and prone to mutual reinforcement. In addition, cross-sectoral challenges are identified, including potential asymmetries in the development of de-occupied territories, resource constraints, and difficulties of multi-level governance. It is argued that the reintegration of de-occupied territories will constitute a complex process of simultaneously managing security, institutional and social risks under conditions of parallel post-war reconstruction and the European integration adaptation of Ukraine.

The proposed typology is analytical in nature and not exhaustive; however, it enables a systematic understanding of future reintegration processes as a multidimensional form of post-conflict governance characterised by multiple potential challenges. It is emphasised that the effectiveness of post-war reconstruction will depend on the state’s capacity to manage interrelated challenges, ensure coordination within multi-level governance structures, and prevent their escalation.

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Khoma, N. (2026). Reintegration of De-occupied Territories: Potential Challenges. Ukrainian Political and Legal Discourse, (23). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20441611

Issue

Section

Political institutions and processes