Characteristics of the key functions of the prosecutor's office in the system of implementing criminal proceedings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15384847Keywords:
prosecutor's office; criminal proceedings; procedural management; public prosecution; supervision; human rights; legality; objectivity; functions of the prosecutor's officeAbstract
The scientific article describes the key role of the prosecutor's office in the system of criminal proceedings, which is defined as an integral part of the mechanism for ensuring legality, law and order and protecting human rights and freedoms. It is established that the modern model of the prosecutor's office of Ukraine is undergoing constant reform in accordance with European legal standards, which necessitates a deep theoretical and methodological analysis of its functions in the criminal process. It is proven that the prosecutor's office performs a multidimensional role, combining the functions of procedural management of pre-trial investigation, support of public prosecution, representation of the interests of the state in court and supervision of compliance with laws by pre-trial investigation bodies. The article identifies four key functions of the prosecutor's office in the context of criminal proceedings, each of which is justified both from the standpoint of current criminal procedural legislation and taking into account the practice of application. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of such parameters of prosecutorial activity as legality, objectivity, procedural efficiency and observance of human rights and freedoms, which are characterized as basic guidelines for law enforcement practice. It has been established that these parameters ensure the integrity and humanity of justice. Based on a systemic approach, it is substantiated that the prosecutor's office is not only an element of prosecution, but also a guarantor of the balance of interests of the individual, society and the state within the framework of criminal proceedings. The goal, object and objectives of the study have been determined, which allows for a comprehensive understanding of the issues, identifying areas for improving prosecutorial activity and contributing to strengthening the institutional foundations of the rule of law. The materials of the article can be useful for both scientists and practitioners in the field of criminal procedural law.
